Civil War Settlements and the Implementation of Military Power-Sharing Arrangements

Peer-reviewed Journal Article

Hartzell, Caroline; & Hoddie, Matthew (2003) Civil War Settlements and the Implementation of Military Power-Sharing Arrangements , Journal of Peace Research 40(3): .

This article considers the role that the implementation of peace agreements has on the prospects for fostering a durable peace following the negotiated resolution of civil wars. Focusing on the 16 peace agreements between 1980 and 1996 that have included provisions for the sharing or dividing of military power among former combatants, the authors find that the complete implementation of this aspect of settlements significantly improves the prospects for maintaining peace. They suggest that this proves to be the case because of the important and credible signals of conciliatory intent among former enemies that are made through the process of implementation. They find that implementation serves as a concrete signal of a genuine commitment to peace as signatories to an agreement prove willing to endure the costs associated with both compromising their original war aims and withstanding potential challenges from within their own groups. Based on these results, the authors offer policy recommendations focusing on the role that third-parry actors and aid donors might play in facilitating the successful implementation of negotiated peace agreements.