A wide-spread observation in existing literature on multi-sited ethnography, is that multi-sitedness is inevitable in dealing with the realities of many people’s lives today but also compromises the anthropologist’ ability to conduct indepth, holistic fieldwork. However, in a multi-sited approach the ‘fieldsite’ is perceived in a transnational way, which questions common assumptions about what is indepth and what is not. Furthermore, most interesting multi-sited research that has been conducted, is based on indepth fieldwork amongst one ethnic group, where sites have been added over a period of time. In this chapter, I will argue that, when doing fieldwork on transnational networks and flows amongst members of the same community in different contexts, depth and multi-sitedness can well be combined. A review can be found on http://www.etmu.fi/fjem/pdf/FJEM_1_2010.pdf, pg 70.
Ashgate (publisher information)