By 2050, two-thirds of the world’s population will live in cities, and the greatest growth in urban populations will take place in the least developed countries. This presents many governments with considerable challenges related to urban governance and the provision of services and opportunities to a burgeoning urban population. Among the concerns is that large youth bulges in
urban centers could be a source of political instability and violence. Here, we assess this claim empirically using newly collected data on city-level urban social disorder, ranging from non-violent actions, such as demonstrations and strikes, to violent political actions, such as riots, terrorism, and armed conflict. The dataset covers 55 major cities in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa for 1960–2006. The study also utilizes a new
United Nations Population Division dataset on urban This paper—a product of the Post Conflict & Social Development Unit, Africa Region, with support from the Trust Fund for Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs—is part of a larger effort to build a solid body of theoretical and applied research on the links between youth exclusion and political violence.
Policy Research Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://econ.worldbank.org. The authors may be contacted at email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org. populations by age and sex.
The study further considers factors that could condition the effect of age structure, in particular the level of informal employment, economic growth, education, and gender imbalances. The analysis finds that large male youth bulges aged 15–24 are not
generally associated with increased risks of either violent or non-violent social disturbance. Furthermore, the proxy measures of “youth exclusion” do not seem to increase the risk that large urban male youth bulges are associated with either form of disturbance. However, several other factors that may be associated with higher levels of youth exclusion—notably absence of democratic institutions, low economic growth, and low levels of
secondary educational attainment—are significantly and robustly associated with increasing levels of urban social disturbance.